I dont own a large AI, but that doesnt mean I havent learned how they operate over the years. I know and have talked with virtually all the AI managers or owners in Negril at one time or another in the past 20+ years of living here. Some have been on the board of directors of Negril.com in the past, and some I see on nearly a daily basis. I do have a somewhat intimate knowledge of how they conduct business.
This topic does often come up in our conversations. This is how I know this information. It is common knowledge to those in the AI business. Heck, even roundiconer mentioned that they were following several lawsuits, so lawsuits can and do occur even if they very little chance of winning should the incident occur off the property or not on an authourized tour.
But the AIs still have to absorb the costs of getting the lawsuit dismissed by using that portion of their liability insurance coverage that covers lawyer and court fees. That is why they dont want to be sued for an incident that happened off their property, it will raise their rates for something they didnt cause. If the incident happens on the property or an authourized tour, that is when the liability insurance directly kicks in and the injured party is compensated. The AI will see a rate increase for that as well because it happened on the property and should/could have been prevented.
Liability insurance is one of the annual expenses that the large AIs must pay to stay in business. The Jamaica Tourist Board requires they carry it just as they do for all licensed and legal hotels, resorts, rentals and tours operators, etc. But the AIs carry much higher coverage limits than the average tourism related business as they have much more exposure being much larger properties (deep pockets). Without this liability coverage, they would not be allowed to conduct business nor would any of the other businesses mentioned. Once again, this common knowledge to those in the business.
The question posted earlier is a great one. Since the guests have already paid in advance for food and drinks, logic does dictate that each meal and drink that their guests would buy off property would save the AI money. Business being business, why would an AI encourage their guests to not buy drinks and meals off the property when it would be in their interest to do so as was asked earlier?
The reason would have to be cost effective enough to offset any savings from the guests buying meals and drinks off the property. And the main reason is the legal liability issues and the high cost of the insurance coverage associated with it. By overseeing all aspects of their guests stay, they minimize the chance of being sued for something they didnt do which would lead to higher insurance rates.