A touch of irony in that question given the opening line of the article. Which of course hails from an advertising campaign that for years generated a similar "good or bad" question? As is the case with "home", locations we like to visit are always going to change. And we're always going to feel wistful for the past.

On balance, the changes in tourism are good for Jamaica. More jobs and greater economic impact. Only those who went to Negril in the 70s will ever experience Negril in the 70s and from all reports the changes in that period are huge. But although great change has occurred, Jamaica has not become endless rows of giant AIs. A much more organic experience remains available for those who desire it. Although everyone can point to their least favorite mega resort of exclaim "that should never have been allowed." I think Jamaica has maintained a relatively balanced type of growth that works better than can be seen in many other tourist spots. Change is inevitable and managing change is not easy. Given the resources available, I think JA has managed to growth relatively well.