Chapter 6
Whew!

Chapter 7
What Now?

Nowthat you don't have to take my word for it, even AI admits it is notintelligent. It can only pretend even when it doesn't have thevaguest clue what it is talking about. Is it lightning or a lightningbug? To AI, it makes no difference. It makes the best guess about thenext word using what is called the LLM Closed book method. And thetech wizards, knowing that this is a flawed model has come up with an"Open book" model, which is even worse. The Open model usesthe old conventional search, like when back when Google was useful,but limits it to only the most recent and most viral entries. It thenuses between 3 and 5 of the top results and presents them. So thedays of getting a listing of 10 search results which you can makedetermination of their value are over.
Anotherproblem with AI results, besides its nearly defiant confidence evenwhen wrong, is the lack of meaningful citations. If meaningfulcitations were made, and displayed first before the AI summary, youmight see info you need in a more explicit way pertaining to yourinquiry. One school of thought is that displaying the citations takesaway from the Artificial Intelligent "illusion". Anotherschool of thought says that in reality, by displaying meaningfulcitations for each summary could cost the AI a fortune because theyscrapped the information off someone's website and may owe them moneyfor using the website's information without permission. So either waythey are defending an illusion or not paying what they rightfullyshould. No matter which, it is bad optics.
Butthere are tech companies that buck the trend. And some of them createsearch engines. One that you should familiarize you and your familywith is known as Mojeek. With Mojeek, you type in what you want toknow more about and it presents you with a listing of websites thatmatch what you are inquiring about. What an amazing concept! Mojeekdoes not rely on Google or Bing or ads but provides valid, usefullistings of websites. Some say their search data is limited, butanyone who had used Google in the past decade knows that more datadoesn't always reveal the best data. Give Mojeek a try. You may neversearch with anything else.
Andburied in the Grok melt down is actually some valuable advice. Itsuggests to always check the Artificial Stupidity answers with books,libraries, or people. If AS lies about history, grab a biography orask a teacher. Not very practical but very telling about what AIthinks about it's own abilities.
Forthose who love to post of social media - this is for you: Call Outthe Garbage! Tell tech companies their Artificial Stupidity is brokenwhen it spits out lies. Post it online—make noise!
Fora more common sense answer: Keep Real Records! Save physical booksand papers. A hammer can’t erase a library; Artificial Stupiditycan wreck digital history.
Andmost importantly - Teach Kids to Question! Show kids ArtificialStupidity is dumber than their toys. Tell them to double-check itlike they’d check a broken toy.