It isn't part of the meal charge if it isn't applied until the end of the meal. Why can't the 10% be calculated as part of the meal?
It's not illegal for me to refer to it as a "tax", given that I don't mean it in the literal term. To me the service charge is like a "tax" on stupidity, except it's geared towards tourists.
It's an accounting process that shouldn't be around in the first place in my opinion.
They sure as hell are playing pricing "games", a service charge is nothing more than a way for the business to have "advertised" lower prices with the requirement that customers pay the service charge in addition to the advertised price.
Do you really see nothing wrong with a business having ala cart additiotional charge?
You can talk about it being a bit more as a take home pay for the employees, but at the end of the day the business can just charge 10% more and pay their employees more. It's a net wash in terms of take home pay for the employees.
Maybe tax is the wrong word to use, but have you never heard of the term tourism tax? It doesn't HAVE to be a tax, it can be used to refer to any charge or cost generally pointed towards tourists to part them with their cash.
Calling it an accounting procedure that benefits the employees is a bit of a stretch, that implies that the base price of the meal doesn't cover employee wages.
They're not transparent given that it's often not clearly stated what the service charge is for. If it's LITERALLY what it's for then why am I paying a gratuity to the server?(Ethics about taking care of the server aside and how poor Jamaica is or isn't) If you say it's a literal charge then the restaurant is charging me for the service provided.
Do you enjoy paying for services rendered twice?
As a paying customer I expect to pay the stated price+gratuity(when in a country that operates on a tipping system), I don't expect to pay for the same service twice.
I'm not having a problem understanding why this concept is so favorably looked upon, I understand why businesses think they can get away with nickle and diming the customer, I don't understand why people would support it.
If a MANAGER of an establishment can't explain why a charge exists on a bill for HIS establishment then I don't see why a customer should be forced to pay it.
Sure I have, that doesn't mean I agree with the massive amount of importing occurring. The problem is the fact that there are 3 million people on an island the size of Connecticut, we should all strive for a sustainable future that uses minimal importing.
Service charge+employee pay+benefits=total compensation. The service charge does affect how much customers "pay" the restaurant for labor.
I understand the service charge, I understand it's supposed to be a "bonus" for the employees, but it is a fee directly paid by customers, and does affect the price of a meal.
That's silly, you can understand a service charge and understand a culture without being confused. I'm not confused with this "accounting practice", I'm annoyed by it's existence and annoyed that the restaurants think customers aren't capable of understanding that we're getting hit twice for "service"
That's nice that all of the businesses feel that having an additional fee on top of the meal works well for them. That doesn't mean the customers don't have a problem with it.
Then why isn't it factored into the price of the meal? It's quite simple, if it isn't optional then it should be automatically rolled into the price of the food.
So it isn't government mandated? Which means it's businesses tacking on additional fees because they want to, not because they "have" to.
A restaurant's goal should be to have happy customers, happy customers shouldn't have to sit there doing math and the prices should be one price, that way customers can make an informed decision.
I'm not sure I can word it any plainer in that service charges just breed resentment and confusion, they don't benefit the customers and in my opinion they don't benefit the restaurant workers because the restaurants will see the service charge and manipulate employee compensation accordingly.