Didn't mean to imply anything sinister. As an engineer I was trained to think critically. And all engineers appreciate it when another engineer looks over their work. That is a combination of pride of work as well as having someone check the work. Generally when a report is released from a reputable engineering consultancy (such as was used by Sandals) you can expect it was peer reviewed and is believable. This report is very believable.

What can go wrong is any number of things. I can offer conjectures and so on but, really, this is an interesting approach to solving a very real problem faced by the Sandals property. I wish them the best of luck and am quite impressed. Much engineering respect to the authors. Would love to see the computer model in operation, but that's simply because I'm a geek for that sort of thing.

The only negative I can see so far is that it will disrupt my (and others residing at Point Village) regular walks while the construction is progressing.