
Originally Posted by
Westenders
Rob, you are only partially right. Yes there are many people who own land in red ground, but there is a large qty that is still capture land, as is up in the West end too. We know many who have acquired land there , built amazing houses, but don't have no title.
And right across Jamaica it happens everywhere, It's common practice there.
I don't want to compete with your 21 years living in negril, as I have never lived in negril, however I spend a lot of time there, and my husband grew up and lived there for a lot longer as one of those founding families. The majority of who are still there. We have very close ties to negril, but realise our social circles will be very different, so have different viewpoints to the ones you share.
The programmes you quoted are a start, but are very flawed. The most in need cannot access these. In fact some are another example of corruption. I know of Jamaicans living in the uk, who have bought into those housing programmes, and rent them out from here.
I don't believe everything I read in the press over here, so would not trust those reports on the govt programmes to be inclusive to those that really need the help.
I don't know what you mean in terms of how these squatters have the ability to help themselves..that's a broad sweep..in what way? Without education, stable housing or stable employment, how do they have the ability..
In terms of those in the article being able to afford to build their own houses, I think a piece of zinc roof and some boards of wood is hardly building a house. My garden tools are housed better than that. They often build with 'recycled' material as well.
I don't agree with the view that Jamaicans don't have respect for these people either. They don't look at the issues the same as us not born there. We all like to think we get it, but we don't really. Jamaicans in my view just try to get on best they can, and understand that others have to do what they can. The richer communities think differently of course, but they are not the majority.
When I showed my husband the article, his negativity was toward the government not the people who got evicted.
And to plough in at 3.30 am with children there, well that's just disgusting. Where was the child protection and safeguarding in that plan?